Healthcare Finance NewsHealthcare Finance News
  • Home
  • Sections
    • Industry News
    • Community Care
    • Hospitals & IDNs
    • Payers
    • Solutions and Services
  • Issues
    • Jan/Feb 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • Sept. 2009
    • August 2009
  • Resource Central
    • All Resources
    • Research
    • White Papers
    • Web Seminars
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Twitter feed
  • LinkedIn group
Select Your Homepage
Search eConnect
Login | Register
Home » News » Industry News | Payers

E-mail to a FriendPrint
Social Bookmarking
  • Delicious Delicious
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Reddit Reddit
  • Newsvine Newsvine
  • Furl Furl
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Google Google
  • Yahoo Yahoo
Report: Paying Medicare Advantage via competitive bidding won't match traditional Medicare

Report: Paying Medicare Advantage via competitive bidding won't match traditional Medicare

September 03, 2009 | Richard Pizzi, Editor

Related Links

  • "Paying Medicare Private Plans By Competitive Bidding: Not the Same as Costs in Regular Medicare" (pdf)

Suggested Content

  • Obama attacks health reform stalemate with targeted solutions
  • Doctor pay cut postponed until March 1
  • $600M in ARRA funding to give 85 community health centers a boost
  • Health reform hangs in the balance
  • Stakeholders laud health reform package, await companion bill
  • AMA, AARP back House health reform bill
  • Senate committee rejects public insurance option
  • AHIP: Seniors in Medicare Advantage receive higher quality care
  • Premier healthcare alliance supports aspects of Obama health plan
  • White House launches Web site to dispel myths about health reform

WASHINGTON – According to a new report, Medicare Advantage plans – private health insurance plans that enroll Medicare beneficiaries – will be paid $11 billion in 2009, or $1,140 more per enrollee than it would cost to care for the same number of beneficiaries under traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama supported paying Medicare private plans the same amount per enrollee as is paid for fee-for-service Medicare. In early 2009, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed a competitive bidding system in which payments to MA plans would be based on the average of all MA plan bids submitted to Medicare in an area, as a way to reduce overpayments to MA plans.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that the proposed bid-based payment system would pay MA plans an average of 101 percent of FFS costs nationally, which would result in federal savings of more than $150 billion over the next 10 years.

However, a new study by The George Washington School of Public Health and Health Services' Department of Health Policy, titled "Paying Medicare Private Plans By Competitive Bidding: Not the Same as Costs in Regular Medicare," found that the new system proposed by the OMB would not achieve President Obama's goal of paying MA plans "the same amount as it would cost to treat the same patients under regular Medicare."

Brian Biles, MD, lead author of the study, funded by The Commonwealth Fund, found that while the average of MA payments would be 101 percent of FFS costs nationally, the level of payments relative to local FFS costs would vary greatly in local areas across the nation.

In 11 states – such as Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin – Medicare payments to MA plans would average more than 10 percent and $1,000 more per enrollee per year than average costs in FFS Medicare.

In Florida, payments to MA plans would be 20 percent, or $2,100, less than average FFS costs in the state. Overall, payments to Florida MA plans would be nearly $2 billion a year less that local FFS costs.

"MA Plans in over 2,000 counties would continue to be paid more than regular FFS Medicare, in many cases as much as the $1,140 national average of annual extra payments," said Biles. "These counties are mostly in rural and smaller urban areas. On the other hand, plans in many large urban areas such as Los Angeles, New York City, Miami and Houston would be paid significantly less than local FFS costs."

"The irony of this approach is that it continues overpayments only where private plans are less efficient than FFS Medicare and institutes a new policy of underpayments for precisely those plans that are the most efficient relative to FFS Medicare," he said.
 

Related Topics:
  • Barack Obama
  • Brian Biles
  • FFS Medicare
  • Medicare
  • Office of Management and Budget
  • Plans By Competitive

Reader Comments (0)Login to Post a Comment

receive news by email

Shopping cart

View your shopping cart.

Most Popular

Latest Headlines
Most Popular
  • New survey finds nursing shortage likely to increase
  • Obama requests $81.3B for HHS in FY2011
  • New Jersey hospital set to exit from Chapter 11
  • Improving efficiency should be goal of healthcare system, expert says
  • Atricure to pay $3.76M to resolve Medicare fraud allegations
  • Vendor Notebook: RevenueMed launches EMR/EHR services
  • New Hampshire hospitals tout economic contributions
  • In pre-Super Bowl appearance, Obama targets healthcare reform
  • LHC Group acquires Georgia home health provider network
  • More than $119M in ARRA funds awarded to combat chronic conditions
Syndicate content

HEALTHCARE FINANCE JOB SPOT

  • Coding Specialist - Health Information Associates - Pawleys Island, SC
  • Manager, Patient Portal - MedStar Health - White Marsh, MD
  • Clinical Coder - Wise Regional Health System - Decatur, TX
  • Revenue Cycle Systems Analyst I - Miami Children's Hospital - Miami, FL
  • Revenue Cycle Systems Analyst II - Miami Children's Hospital - Miami, FL
more jobs
  • EHRWatch.com

    EHRWatch.com offers news, commentary and community participation on the developments in electronic health records.

  • Priming the Pump

    Priming the Pump provides practical news on the stimulus package and the incentives that it offers to healthcare providers.

  • NHINWatch

    Visit NHINWatch.com for coverage of the Nationwide Health Information Network.

  • Mobile Health Watch

    Stay up to date on the latest mobility news at Mobile Health Watch.

  • MedTech Publishing

    Visit our company Web page to learn more about MedTech Publishing.

  • LinkedIn

    Join our LinkedIn group to connect with other Healthcare Finance News readers.

  • Healthcare Finance Job Spot

    Check out the latest open positions at Healthcare Finance Job Spot.

  • Healthcare IT News

    Visit Healthcare IT News for the latest health information technology news.

  • Facebook

    Join Healthcare Finance News on Facebook to connect with other readers!

Marketplace

  • Home
  • Issues
  • Resource Central
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
Healthcare Finance News is a publication of MedTech Publishing Company LLC.
For more information about MedTech Publishing Company and its publications, please visit medtechpublishing.com.
©2009 MedTech Publishing
Powered by Phase2 Technology.