Suggested Content
- IOM calls for more U.S. public health spending
- Hospitals expand to attract well-insured patients
- Healthcare sees highest CEO turnover rates
- Getting a handle on denials helps revenue integrity
- Banner Health cuts $41.5M from the supply chain
- Staff scheduling tools can improve the bottom line
- Revenue integrity tops list of concerns for hospital executives
- Keep focus on drug shortage crisis
- Drug prices to see modest increase
- 2012 kicks off with record healthcare M&A volume
Related Resources
- Disrupting Hospital Based Care: The Innovation Race to Establish 21st Century Care Models
- Ensuring Proper Reimbursement for Hospital-administered Drugs
- How new technology is helping healthcare providers meet the pressing challenges of reducing bad debt by improving patient billing and collection
- Maximizing Yield: Measuring the True Return of Your Hospital's Revenue Cycle
- RAC Best Practices: Utilization Management
CONCORD, MA – Fifty-seven percent of private health plan payers are hesitant to accelerate the adoption of bundled payments as a new reimbursement model and would be more likely to do so upon receiving an indication of positive feedback from physicians and hospitals, according to a recent poll from healthcare IT and research firm Gantry Group, LLC.
Gantry Group recently polled executives from private health plans to assess the healthcare industry drivers that would accelerate the adoption of bundled payments.
Health plans are most concerned about their provider networks’ willingness to accept and adopt payment bundling as a new reimbursement method.
“Payers would accelerate bundled payment initiatives with the indication of positive feedback and proactive participation in the payment bundle designs from physicians and hospitals,” Gantry Group said in a press release. “Related to this issue, payers believe that the availability of pre-built, standardized payment bundles from a credible source that is trusted by physicians would improve providers’ receptivity to bundled payments.”




