Blunt amendment fails in Senate in latest contraception coverage salvo

An amendment tacked onto an unrelated transportation bill that would allow any employer, not just those affiliated with a religious organization, to not offer contraceptive health coverage to employees failed yesterday in the U.S. Senate by a vote of 51-48.

The votes dashed the latest hopes of conservatives and religious organizations as they continue to press the Obama administration to back off its recent mandate that all employers, with the exception of religious institutions, must offer health plans that provide free preventive health services to women including contraceptive services.

The amendment, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) and co-sponsored by Sen. Marco Rubio (F-FL), didn’t focus solely on exempting any kind of faith-based employer from providing contraceptive service, instead opting to allow any employer to decline to offer any health benefit if they had “moral or religious” objections.

That proved too broad for Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe, who was the only Republican to vote against the amendment, saying on MSNBC that the amendment was too broad to support.

Sen. Blunt contends that the amendment did not open the door to allowing employers to essentially pick and choose which procedure they would offer and which they wouldn’t in addition to contraceptive benefits.

"This bill would just simply say that those healthcare providers don't have to follow that mandate if it violates their faith principles," according to a press release issued last month by Blunt. "This is about the First Amendment. It's about religious beliefs. It's not about any one issue."

Senate Democrats didn’t buy that argument.

"It is terrible policy,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) told CBS News. “It will allow any employer in America to cut off any preventive care for any religious or moral reason. It would simply give every boss in America the right to make the healthcare decisions for their workers and their families."

As a polarizing issue, the debate stems on two core beliefs: one that contends the mandate is a violation of religious freedom guaranteed under the Constitution and another that contends this is an issue of women’s rights.

"Voters across America watched today as a majority of the United States Senate voted to gut the First Amendment of our Constitution by failing to protect the religious freedom of all Americans,” said Brian Burch, president of CatholicVote.org, in a prepared statement after the vote. "The President and his Secretary of Health and Human Services have divided the country with an unprecedented assault on our first freedom - the right to believe - by forcing every American to pay for medicines and procedures that millions of Americans find morally objectionable.”

The National Organization for Women (NOW) hailed the Senate vote.

Previous
1

Showing 2 Comments

cthomas say: Whose Rights?

No employer should be able to force its religious beliefs on its employees. That is an infringement of that individual's rights. The employee should enjoy the same protections and benefits that are guaranteed under law to all people, regardless of who the employee works for. Allowing employers to pick and choose what their healthcare packages will look like, based on their person beliefs, opens a Pandora's box of strange and whacky exceptions. Jehovah's Witness employers could carve blood transfusions out of their healthcare coverage. Christian Scientists could mandate prayer only for healthcare coverage. And note that this bill was not about religious objections only ... it extended to any employer's personal moral beliefs. So if I have a moral objection to smokers, I could carve out all treatment for smoking related illness. If I have a moral objection to overpopulation, I could carve out prenatal and maternity coverage for all but the first 1 or 2 children. There was no end to the mischief this bone-headed bill would have created.

Jim Craig say: Purported contraception issue

The discourse around this issue sickens me. The very first civil liberty demanded by the people of the United States as a condition to their ratification of the constitution of our federal government, was the prohibition of that level of government from intefering in any way with an establishment of religion. The contraception mandate is a bright-line violation of this most fundamental American principle.

As offensive as this constitutional violation of the rights of all Americans is the obscene contention that contraception is a form of preventive healthcare. Pregnancy is not a disease. It is the healthy result of heterosexual activity. Preventing that healthy result is a lifestyle choice that all women, and men have a right to seek. In fact the vast majority have sought and obtained that result for decades, without the coercive interference of the federal government!

Contraception is cheap and readily available to all. There has been no crisis over people's ability to access it.

Why the heck are we so easily duped into surrendering our freedom for a cheap crumb that we are told is free, but of course it is not? Understand people that the unconstitutional power that you effectively grant to your politicians today to obtain these mere crumbs, which the politicians are in fact stealing from your fellow citizens, is the very same power future politicians will use to steal the rights you will then wish you had retained...